|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Thomas de Groot wrote:
>
> Of course you are right about this in principle. However, if "art" means
> that every single item of whatever production by whoever throws a dot of
> paint or pushes a button or shoots an image should be considered just that,
> art, I disagree. Art is no free meal so to speak, neither was it when it was
> merely a "skill" performed by a crafter.
>
The closest I have come to a universal tenent with Art is:
"Meaning lies with the viewer."
Sometimes tough to accept.
Othertimes no help at all.
-Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |